نفرّق بين الفعل والاستحلال من وقع في الزنا مع اعترافه بالتحريم: عاصٍ مرتكب لكبيرة. تحليل الزنا مع العلم بتحريمه ردّ لحكم الله وليس مجرد معصية، بل اعتداء على أصل التشريع ...
ما يُسمّى بـ"زواج المتعة" أو "الزواج المؤقت" لا ينسجم مع أي معيار شرعي أو أخلاقي لمعنى الزواج. فالعلاقة التي تُبنى منذ بدايتها على التوقيت والانفصال ليست زواجًا، بل صورة من صور الزنا المغلّف باسم الدين. ساعة أو يوم أو شهر لا تغيّر من الحقيقة شيئًا؛ فالمضمون واحد: متعة عابرة، جسد يُستعمل ثم يُترك، بلا وفاء، بلا مسؤولية، وبلا رابطة إنسانية مستقرة.
فالزواج في الإسلام ميثاق غليظ، وعهد حياة، وشراكة دائمة تقوم على المودة والرحمة وتحمل التبعات الأخلاقية والاجتماعية. أما العلاقة المؤقتة التي تُمارس بنية الانتهاء لا الاستمرار، فهي خروج عن جوهر الزواج، وتشويه لمعناه، وانحراف عن مقاصد الشريعة.
من أخطر ما في هذا المسار هو توظيف النصوص الدينية خارج سياقها لتبرير ممارسات تخالف روح الإسلام. فالاستدلال بجزء من قوله تعالى:
لتسويق المتعة المؤقتة، يتجاهل السياق الكامل للآية، وما قبلها وما بعدها، حيث الحديث واضح عن النكاح الدائم، والمهر، وحقوق الزوجة، وضوابط العلاقة الشرعية. هذا الأسلوب في التعامل مع القرآن لا يقوم على فهم علمي ولا على منهج مقاصدي، بل على اقتطاع النصوص وتوجيهها لخدمة هوى النفس وواقع منحرف.
. هذا تلاعب صارخ بالقرآن، وتحريف للنصوص، وتحويل الزنا إلى عبادة والفاحشة إلى اجتهاد.
فالقرآن لا يُجزّأ بحسب الأهواء، ولا يُستعمل لتحويل الفاحشة إلى عبادة، ولا لتبديل الحرام إلى اجتهاد مشروع.
التجربة الاجتماعية والواقع الميداني يكشفان أن هذا النوع من العلاقات يخلّف نتائج خطيرة، منها:
تسليع المرأة وتحويلها إلى علاقة مؤقتة بلا ضمان ولا استقرار.
إهدار كرامة الأنثى بحرمانها من الأمان العاطفي والاجتماعي الذي يوفّره الزواج الحقيقي.
اضطراب النسب وضياع الحقوق وما يترتب عليه من أزمات نفسية وأسرية للأطفال.
تفكيك البنية الاجتماعية عبر نشر علاقات بلا جذور، وأسر بلا استمرارية، وقيم بلا ثبات.
وأي علاقة هدفها المتعة المؤقتة فقط مع نية الانفصال وادراكها منذ البداية، مهما تغيّر اسمها أو غُلّفت بعبارات شرعية، تبقى في حقيقتها زنا لا زواجًا.
الطاعة المطلقة لا تكون إلا لله ولرسله فيما بلّغوا عن الحق. أما البشر، مهما علا شأنهم، فلا يُتّبعون على باطل، ولا يُسلَّم لهم إذا خالف قولهم مقاصد الشريعة وأصول الدين.
ومن يجعل من الدين وسيلة للتجارة بالأهواء، أو لتبرير الفواحش، أو لتزييف وعي الناس، فإنه لا يخدم الدين، بل يسيء إليه ويشوّه صورته ويستغل قدسيته.
ولا علاقة له بعقود المتعة المؤقتة، ولا بالممارسات العابرة، ولا بثقافة الاستهلاك الجنسي.
الزواج: الركيزة الأساسية للمجتمع
الزواج في جوهره ومبادئه الأساسية هو ميثاق شرعي واجتماعي لبناء أسرة مستقرة.
لا علاقة له بالصفقات، ولا بالمؤقتات، ولا بالشهوة العابرة:
المعنى اللغوي: الاتحاد والاقتران، اجتماع شخصين ليصبحا زوجًا وزوجة.
المعنى الاصطلاحي: عقد شرعي واجتماعي لتنظيم حقوق وواجبات الزوجين.
في الإسلام: "النكاح" هدفه الطمأنينة، المحبة، الرحمة، والحفاظ على النسل واستقرار المجتمع.
الخلاصة
زواج المتعة ليس زواجًا، بل زنا باسم الدين.
كل من يبرّره يشارك في الجريمة الأخلاقية والدينية.
الزواج الحقيقي ميثاق حياة، رابطة مسؤولية، التزام وفاء.
الحقائق واضحة، والباطل لا يصير حلالًا لأنه تكلّم باسم الله. . .
- والباطل لا يصبح حقًا لأنه تزيّن بلغة دينية.
- الحق واضح، ومنهج الإصلاح يبدأ بإعادة الأمور إلى نصابها،
- وكشف الزيف، وحماية قدسية الزواج من التحريف.



انظروا إلى خطورة ما يُقال. يدّعي هذا الشخص (وهو شيطان بكل معنى الكلمة) أن الله خلق المرأة كنوعٍ من "الحيوانات" لتخدم الرجل وتُستغل وتستدخم، وأنها مُنحت هيئة بشرية فقط لكي لا ينفر منها الرجال.
بل إنه يُشبهها بالأبقار والأغنام والبغال، مُجردًا إياها تمامًا من كرامتها وإنسانيتها.
لا يقتصر هذا الادعاء على مجرد الإهانة، بل يُختزل المرأة إلى سلعة، ويُحاول توفير غطاء ديني لاستغلالها.
من هذا المنظور، يُمكننا أن نفهم لماذا يختلق هؤلاء الزعماء الدينيون علاقاتٍ تُقدم تحت مسمياتٍ مثل "الزواج المؤقت" أو "زواج المتعة"، زاعمين أنها جزءٌ من تعاليم دينية، بينما في الحقيقة يُستغل الدين لتبرير الرغبات وترسيخ نظرةٍ مُهينةٍ ومُحتقرةٍ للمرأة.
إنها محاولةٌ لإضفاء الشرعية على الإذلال والاستغلال من خلال خطابٍ ديني مُشوّه، يُجرّد المرأة أولًا من إنسانيتها، ثم يُبرر معاملتها كأداةٍ بدلًا من كونها إنسانةً كاملةً لها كرامةٌ وحقوقٌ أصيلة.
Look at the gravity of what is being said. This( person is totally evildoer) claims that God created women as a type of “animal” to serve and be used by men, and that they were merely given a human form so that men would not be repelled by them.
He even compares them to cows, sheep, and mules—stripping them entirely of dignity and humanity.
This argument does not stop at mere insult; it reduces women to commodities and attempts to provide a religious cover for their exploitation.
From this perspective, we can see why those religious leaders invent relationships presented under labels such as “temporary marriage” or “pleasure marriage,” claiming they are part of religious teachings, while in reality religion is being exploited to justify desires and reinforce a degrading, contemptuous view of women.
It is an attempt to legitimize humiliation and exploitation through a distorted religious discourse—one that first dehumanizes women, then justifies treating them as tools rather than as full human beings with inherent dignity and rights.
.
Sex trade in Iraq, also known as (Mutah marriage( nikah mut'ah) or temporary marriage).
تجارة الجنس في العراق، والمعروفة أيضاً باسم (الزواج المؤقت او زواج المتعة)..
نصائح صحيحة لزواج سعيد^
Correct advices for good marriage ^
---
Important Notice: When addressing controversial practices such as mut‘ah marriage, misyar marriage, and other forms that have stripped marriage of its essential purposes, the discussion should be approached from the perspective of reform, not defamation, and from awareness and education, not provocation.
Islam came to preserve life, protect human dignity, and build the family upon foundations of stability and responsibility — not to turn marriage into a temporary relationship or a formal arrangement devoid of the true meaning of the “solemn covenant.”
Accordingly, discussing these issues is legitimate and necessary when presented in a calm, academic manner that clarifies the correct Islamic concept of marriage and exposes the consequences of deviating from its objectives, without unjust generalization or personal attacks.
It is also essential to emphasize the unity of the Ummah, uphold the application of Islamic legal limits without negligence or mockery of the Sharia. One must avoid sarcasm and provocation, because wise judgement is not about winning battles, but about correcting misconceptions, protecting values, bringing hearts closer together, and preventing juristic disagreements from turning into social discord or sectarian conflict.
True reform is neither achieved by remaining silent about wrongdoing nor by publicly shaming people, but by combining clarity in truth, fairness in speech, and mercy in approach. A just judge does not generalize rulings upon all people without proper verification.
In Islam, the principle is to deal with people according to what is apparent and to leave their inner intentions to Allah, as the Prophet ﷺ said:
“I was not commanded to search people’s hearts or split open their chests” (Agreed upon).
However, this does not mean accepting falsehood or remaining silent about the legalization of what is forbidden.
The implementation of legal punishments is not the responsibility of individuals, guardians, or the general public. Rather, it is the duty of the legitimate judiciary and authorized authority, in order to prevent chaos, injustice, and misjudgment.
When a wrongdoing becomes public, it must be addressed according to Islamic guidelines: through advice, clarification of Allah’s rulings, and disciplined condemnation — without disorder, aggression, or individuals taking the law into their own hands — while considering public interest and avoiding greater harm.
We must distinguish between committing a sinful act and declaring it lawful. Whoever commits adultery while acknowledging its prohibition is a sinner who has committed a major sin. But declaring the permissibility of adultery (temporary marriage) as part of the religion, while knowing that it is forbidden, is a rejection of God's rule - not just a sin, but an attack on the very foundation of divine legislation itself.
---
Mut‘ah Marriage: Adultery Disguised with a Religious Cover
What is called “Mut‘ah marriage” or “temporary marriage” does not conform to any legitimate religious or ethical standard of marriage. A relationship that is built from the outset on timing and separation is not marriage, but a form of adultery wrapped in religious language. An hour, a day, or a month makes no difference; the reality remains the same: fleeting pleasure, a body used and then abandoned—without loyalty, without responsibility, and without a stable human bond.
Marriage in Islam is a solemn covenant, a lifelong commitment, and a lasting partnership based on affection, mercy, and moral and social responsibility. A temporary relationship practiced with the intention of termination rather than continuity is a deviation from the essence of marriage, a distortion of its meaning, and a violation of the objectives of Sharia.
---
Distorting Texts and Removing Them from Their Intended Purposes
One of the most dangerous aspects of this path is the misuse of religious texts outside their proper context to justify practices that contradict the spirit of Islam. Selectively quoting part of Allah’s statement:
(Surah An-Nisa, 4:24):
“And [forbidden to you are] married women, except those your right hands possess. [This is] the decree of Allah upon you. And lawful to you are all beyond that, provided you seek them with your wealth, desiring chastity, not committing sexual immorality. So for whatever you enjoy of them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. And there is no blame upon you for what you mutually agree beyond the obligation. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.”
> “So for whatever you enjoy from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation”
(An-Nisa: 24)
Ignoring the full context of the verse—what precedes and follows it—where the discussion clearly revolves around permanent marriage, dowry, the wife's rights, and the legal rulings of marriage, constitutes a distortion of meaning and a manipulation of divine revelation.
This approach is neither scientific nor objective (in terms of its intended meaning); rather, it is an interpretation of texts to serve a distorted reality. It is a blatant manipulation of the Quran, a distortion of divine texts, and a transformation of adultery into worship and immorality into legitimate interpretation.
The Quran is not to be fragmented according to whims, nor is it to be used to justify immorality or to make the forbidden permissible.
---
The Catastrophic Consequences of This Deviation
Exploitation of women: Women are reduced to temporary commodities, used and discarded.
Degradation of womanhood: Loss of security, stability, dignity, and affection.
Loss of children: Unstable lineage, lost rights, and broken futures.
Destruction of society: Rootless relationships, fragile families, and hollow values.
Whoever justifies this deviation or remains silent about it is not neutral, but a partner in moral and religious wrongdoing.
To repeat: whoever justifies it, beautifies its image, or remains silent about it does not stand in neutrality, but practically contributes to reinforcing moral and religious corruption.
Social reality and lived experience clearly show that this type of relationship produces serious consequences, including:
Commodifying women and reducing relationships to temporary arrangements without security or stability.
Stripping women of emotional and social protection provided by genuine marriage.
Disruption of lineage and loss of rights, leading to psychological and familial crises for children.
Weakening the social structure by spreading unstable relationships, fragile families, and inconsistent values.
---
True Marriage: A Covenant of Life, Not a Contract of Benefit
Legitimate marriage is founded on principles that cannot be falsified:
Permanence, not temporariness
Commitment, not transaction
Responsibility, not impulse
A lifelong partnership, not an expiration date
Any relationship based solely on temporary pleasure with prior intent to separate—regardless of its name or religious labeling—remains in reality adultery, not marriage.
---
The Balance of Obedience and Following
Absolute obedience belongs only to Allah and His Messengers in what they conveyed of truth. As for human beings, no matter how esteemed, they are not to be followed in falsehood, nor obeyed when their views contradict the objectives of Sharia and the foundations of religion.
Whoever uses religion as a tool to trade in desires, justify immorality, or mislead people does not serve Islam, but rather harms it, distorts its image, and exploits its sanctity.
---
Marriage: The Foundation of Social Stability
Marriage in its essence is a religious and social contract to build a stable family:
Linguistically: union and joining.
Terminologically: a contract regulating rights and duties.
Islamically: tranquility, affection, mercy, preservation of lineage, and building a cohesive society.
It has nothing to do with temporary pleasure contracts, fleeting practices, or a culture of sexual consumption.
---
Marriage: The Pillar of Society
Marriage in its core principles is a religious and social covenant to establish a stable family. It is not related to transactions, temporary arrangements, or fleeting desires:
Linguistic meaning: union and pairing—two individuals becoming husband and wife.
Technical meaning: a legal and social contract organizing mutual rights and obligations.
In Islam: marriage aims at serenity, love, mercy, preservation of lineage, and social stability.
---
Conclusion
Mut‘ah marriage is not marriage—it is adultery under the name of religion.
Whoever justifies it participates in moral and religious wrongdoing.
True marriage is a covenant of life, a bond of responsibility, and a commitment of loyalty.
Truth is clear, and falsehood does not become lawful simply because it speaks in the name of God.
Falsehood does not become truth because it is decorated with religious language.
The truth is evident. The path of reform begins by restoring matters to their rightful place, exposing deception, and protecting the sanctity of marriage from distortion.
---
.
Comments
Post a Comment